How much Spam and Virus does my mail server receive?

Wikipedia estimates that 80% to 85% of the incoming mail is “abusive email”. I had a chance to check what percentage of email in one of our domains contain spam and virus.

Background
This Email Server serves only one domain, has around 150 accounts, but only around 50 are active. It was running without any anti-virus or anti-spam protection until last week. Last Monday, on 8th Jan we implemented a demo unit of Barracuda Spam Firewall, and this is what I found.

What does the the email Statics say

Unique Recipients: 2239. This means the spammers are just bombarding the server by sending emails to existing and non existing users.
Total Received: 214,232 (Total number of emails received in 4 days)
Allowed: 8,225 (Around 3.8% of the emails are good emails)
Allowed: Tagged: 7,086 (Around 3.3% of the emails were tagged for possible spam and users reported that all of the tagged emails were spam)
Blocked Virus: 1,293 (Around 0.6% of emails contain viruses and worms)
Blocked: 197,628 (92.2% of the emails were Spam emails)

After combining Blocked, Tagged and Virus emails, we found around 96% of the total received emails to be abusive emails (either Spam, Virus or Worm). Only around 4% of the emails were good emails.

Barracuda-Status
Barracuda Admin Dashboard, showing the overall Status of the Email activity


Hourly-Daily
Detailed Hourly and Daily Mail Statistics

Queue
Qmailmrtg graph, showing Weekly Queue size from email server itself

Before implementing the Barracuda, this server always had 2000+ emails in it’s queue for remote delivery, that was mainly due to the spams sent with non-existing return address. After the implementation of Barracuda Firewall on Monday, it dropped dramatically to average of around 200 emails in remote delivery queue .

Concurrency
Qmailmrtg graph of the Local/Remote SMTP Concurrent Connections

Before the implementation of Barracuda, the average concurrent remote smtp connections used to be around 35 because of trying to bounce back the emails sent to non-existing users. After the implementation of Barracuda Spam Firewall, the remote concurrency has dropped to average of 7.

Conclusion
As you can see from my results, how much of a garbage and really harmful stuff can end up in the users Inbox. So, some sort of Spam and Virus protection is a must for every email server. There’re many commercial products like Barracuda to solve this problem. But if you want a free solution, Spamassassin plus Clam Antivirus is the best choice. It’s popular, it’s free and it’s also very effective.

Posted by Niranjan on January 12th, 2007 in Tips |
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
You might be interested in these as well:

One Response to 'How much Spam and Virus does my mail server receive?'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'How much Spam and Virus does my mail server receive?'.

  1. Shin Jender said,

    on January 12th, 2007 at 10:04 pm

    This will all end with crying.

  2. Niranjan said,

    on January 13th, 2007 at 9:43 am

    Shin,
    What does that mean? It would be great if you could elaborate a bit…


  3. on February 2nd, 2007 at 10:37 pm

    [...] Today it’s impossible to think business and personal communications without email. Sending and receiving emails costs you and me nothing. It’s free! The zero cost (for users), the efficiency of delivery, and ease of use has made it so popular. But now email has become a victim of it’s own success. Just my quick test with one email server for 4 days showed that 96% of the emails received were abusive. [...]


  4. on April 10th, 2007 at 2:36 pm

    [...] Today it’s impossible to think business and personal communications without email. Sending and receiving emails costs you and me nothing. It’s free! The zero cost (for users), the efficiency of delivery, and ease of use has made it so popular. But now email has become a victim of it’s own success. Just my quick test with one email server for 4 days showed that 96% of the emails received were abusive. [...]

Post a comment